The following clinically significant adverse reactions are described elsewhere in the labeling: • Diarrhea [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 ) ] • Bullous and Exfoliative Skin Disorders [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.2 ) ] • Interstitial Lung Disease [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3 ) ] • Hepatic Toxicity […
Show full text
The following clinically significant adverse reactions are described elsewhere in the labeling: • Diarrhea [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 ) ] • Bullous and Exfoliative Skin Disorders [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.2 ) ] • Interstitial Lung Disease [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3 ) ] • Hepatic Toxicity [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.4 ) ] • Gastrointestinal Perforation [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.5 ) ] • Keratitis [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.6 ) ] Most common adverse reactions (≥20%) were diarrhea, rash/acneiform dermatitis, stomatitis, paronychia, dry skin, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, pruritus ( 6.1 ). To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Hetero Labs Limited at 1-866-495-1995 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch . 6.1 Clinical Trials Experience Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. The data in the Warnings and Precautions section reflect exposure to afatinib for clinically significant adverse reactions in 4257 patients enrolled in LUX-Lung 3 (n=229) and LUX-Lung 8 (n=392), and 3636 patients with cancer enrolled in 42 studies of afatinib administered alone or in combination with other anti-neoplastic drugs at afatinib doses ranging from 10 to 70 mg daily or at doses 10 to 160 mg in other regimens. The mean exposure was 5.5 months. The population included patients with various cancers, the most common of which were NSCLC, breast, colorectal, brain, and head and neck. The data described below reflect exposure to afatinib as a single agent in LUX-Lung 3, a randomized, active-controlled trial conducted in patients with EGFR mutation-positive, metastatic NSCLC, and in LUX-Lung 8, a randomized, active-controlled trial in patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy. EGFR Mutation-Positive Metastatic NSCLC The safety of afatinib was evaluated in 229 EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve patients with EGFR mutation-positive, metastatic non-squamous NSCLC enrolled in a randomized (2:1), multicenter, open-label trial (LUX-Lung 3). Patients received either afatinib 40 mg daily until documented disease progression or intolerance to the therapy or pemetrexed 500 mg/m² followed after 30 minutes by cisplatin 75 mg/m² every three weeks for a maximum of six treatment courses. The median exposure was 11 months for patients treated with afatinib and 3.4 months for patients treated with pemetrexed/cisplatin. The overall trial population had a median age of 61 years; 61% of patients in the afatinib arm and 60% of patients in the pemetrexed/cisplatin arm were younger than 65 years. A total of 64% of patients on afatinib and 67% of pemetrexed/cisplatin patients were female. More than two-thirds of patients were from Asia (afatinib 70%; pemetrexed/cisplatin 72%). Serious adverse reactions were reported in 29% of patients treated with afatinib. The most frequent serious adverse reactions reported in patients treated with afatinib were diarrhea (6.6%); vomiting (4.8%); and dyspnea, fatigue, and hypokalemia (1.7% each). Fatal adverse reactions in afatinib-treated patients in LUX-Lung 3 included pulmonary toxicity/ILD-like adverse reactions (1.3%), sepsis (0.43%), and pneumonia (0.43%). Dose reductions due to adverse reactions were required in 57% of afatinib-treated patients. The most frequent adverse reactions that led to dose reduction in the patients treated with afatinib were diarrhea (20%), rash/acne (19%), paronychia (14%), and stomatitis (10%). Discontinuation of therapy in afatinib-treated patients for adverse reactions was 14.0%. The most frequent adverse reactions that led to discontinuation in afatinib-treated patients were diarrhea (1.3%), ILD (0.9%), and paronychia (0.9%). Clinical trials of afatinib excluded patients with an abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), i.e., below the institutional lower limit of normal. In LUX-Lung 3, all patients were evaluated for LVEF at screening and every 9 weeks thereafter in the afatinib-treated group and as needed in the pemetrexed/cisplatin group. More afatinib-treated patients (2.2%; n=5) experienced ventricular dysfunction (defined as diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular dysfunction, or ventricular dilation; all < Grade 3) compared to chemotherapy-treated patients (0.9%; n=1). Tables 1 and 2 summarize common adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities in LUX-Lung 3. Table 1 Adverse Reactions Reported in ≥10% of Afatinib-Treated Patients in LUX-Lung 3* Adverse Reaction Afatinib n=229 Pemetrexed/Cisplatin n=111 All Grades (%) Grade 3† (%) All Grades (%) Grade 3† (%) Gastrointestinal disorders Diarrhea 96 15 23 2 Stomatitis 1 71 9 15 1 Cheilitis 12 0 1 0 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Rash/acneiform dermatitis 2 90 16 11 0 Pruritus 21 0 1 0 Dry skin 31 0 2 0 Infections Paronychia 3 58 11 0 0 Cystitis 13 1 5 0 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Epistaxis 17 0 2 1 Rhinorrhea 11 0 6 0 Investigations Weight decreased 17 1 14 1 General disorders and administration site conditions Pyrexia 12 0 6 0 Eye disorders Conjunctivitis 11 0 3 0 *NCI CTCAE v 3.0 †None of the adverse reactions in this table except stomatitis (one patient on afatinib [0.4%]) were Grade 4 in severity. 1Includes stomatitis, aphthous stomatitis, mucosal inflammation, mouth ulceration, oral mucosa erosion, mucosal erosion, mucosal ulceration 2Includes acne, acne pustular, dermatitis, acneiform dermatitis, dermatosis, drug eruption, erythema, exfoliative rash, folliculitis, rash, rash erythematous, rash follicular, rash generalized, rash macular, rash maculo-papular, rash pruritic, rash pustular, skin disorder, skin erosion, skin exfoliation, skin fissures, skin lesion, skin reaction, skin toxicity, skin ulcer 3Includes paronychia, nail infection, nail bed infection Other clinically important adverse reactions observed in patients treated with afatinib but that occurred at a higher incidence in pemetrexed/cisplatin-treated patients and not listed elsewhere in section 6 include: decreased appetite (29% Grades 1 to 4, 4% Grade 3), nausea (25% Grades 1 to 4, 4% Grade 3), and vomiting (23% Grades 1 to 4, 4% Grade 3). Table 2 Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in ≥10% of Afatinib Arm and at ≥2% Higher Incidence than in Chemotherapy Arm in LUX-Lung 3* Laboratory Abnormality Afatinib n=229 Pemetrexed/Cisplatin n=111 All Grades (%) Grades 3 to 4 (%) All Grades (%) Grades 3 to 4 (%) Increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 54 2 27 1 Increased alkaline phosphate 51 3 46 1 Decreased creatinine clearance 49 2 47 1 Increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 46 3 22 1 Decreased lymphocytes 38 9 32 14 Decreased potassium 30 8 11 3 Increased bilirubin 16 1 8 0 *NCI CTCAE v 3.0 Previously Treated, Metastatic Squamous NSCLC The safety of afatinib was evaluated in 392 afatinib-treated patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC enrolled in a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial (LUX-Lung 8). Patients were required to have received at least four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0 or 1, and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients received afatinib 40 mg once daily (n=392) or erlotinib 150 mg once daily (n=395). Treatment continued until documented disease progression or intolerance to the therapy. The median exposure was 2.1 months for patients treated with afatinib, 15% were exposed for at least 6 months, and 5% were exposed for at least 12 months. Among the 392 afatinib -treated patients, the median age was 65 years, 53% were 65 years of age or older, 84% were male, 72% were White, 25% were Asian, ECOG PS 0 (32%) or 1 (68%). Serious adverse reactions occurred in 44% of patients treated with afatinib. The most frequent serious adverse reactions in patients treated with afatinib were pneumonia (6.6%), diarrhea (4.6%), and dehydration and dyspnea (3.1% each). Fatal adverse reactions in afatinib-treated patients included ILD (0.5%), pneumonia (0.3%), respiratory failure (0.3%), acute renal failure (0.3%), and general physical health deterioration (0.3%). The most frequent adverse reactions that led to discontinuation in afatinib-treated patients were diarrhea (4.1%) and rash/acne (2.6%). Dose reductions due to adverse reactions were required in 27% of afatinib-treated patients and discontinuation of afatinib for adverse reactions was required for 20%. The most frequent adverse reactions that led to dose reduction in the patients treated with afatinib were diarrhea (15%), rash/acne (5.9%), and stomatitis (3.1%). Tables 3 and 4 summarize common adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities in LUX-Lung 8. Table 3 Adverse Reactions Reported in ≥10% of Afatinib -Treated Patients in LUX-Lung 8* Adverse Reaction Afatinib n=392 Erlotinib n=395 All Grades (%) Grade 3 to 4 (%) All Grades (%) Grade 3 to 4 (%) Gastrointestinal disorders Diarrhea 75 11 41 3 Stomatitis 1 30 4 11 1 Nausea 21 2 16 1 Vomiting 13 1 10 1 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Rash/acneiform dermatitis2 70 7 70 11 Pruritus 10 0 13 0 Metabolism and nutrition disorders Decreased appetite 25 3 26 2 Infections Paronychia 3 11 1 5 0 *NCI CTCAE v 3.0 1 Includes stomatitis, aphthous stomatitis, mucosal inflammation, mouth ulceration, oral mucosa erosion, mucosal erosion, mucosal ulceration 2 Includes acne, dermatitis, acneiform dermatitis, eczema, erythema, exfoliative rash, folliculitis, rash, rash generalized, rash macular, rash maculo-papular, rash pruritic, rash pustular, skin exfoliation, skin fissures, skin lesion, skin reaction, skin toxicity, skin ulcer 3 Includes paronychia, nail infection, nail bed infection Table 4 Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in ≥10% of Afatinib Arm and at ≥2% Higher Incidence than in Erlotinib Arm in LUX-Lung 8* Laboratory Abnormality Afatinib n=392 Erlotinib n=395 All Grades (%) Grades 3 to 4 (%) All Grades (%) Grades 3 to 4 (%) Increased alkaline phosphate 34 2 31 0 Decreased white blood cell count 12 1 8 1 Decreased potassium 11 1 8 1 *NCI CTCAE v 3.0 Other clinically important laboratory abnormalities observed in patients treated with afatinib that are not listed in Table 4 are: increased alanine aminotransferase (10% Grade 1 to 4; 1% Grade 3 to 4), increased aspartate aminotransferase (7% Grade 1 to 4; 1% Grade 3 to 4), and increased bilirubin (3% Grade 1 to 4; 0 Grade 3 to 4). Less Common Adverse Reactions Other adverse reactions reported in patients treated with afatinib in LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 8 include: Skin and subcutaneous disorders: nail disorders occurred in 9.2% and 2.8% of patients, respectively. 6.2 Postmarketing Experience The following adverse reactions have been identified during postapproval use of afatinib. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. • Pancreatitis • Toxic epidermal necrolysis/Stevens Johnson syndrome